
Though schools are required to check children’s vision starting in kindergarten, more California kids aren’t getting the continuing vision care they need compared to years past — raising concern among health experts.
As CalMatters’ Kristen Hwang reports, nationwide data suggests that at least one in four kids need glasses. But only a fraction of children who are flagged for vision problems receive follow-up care, such as going to the optometrist and getting fitted for glasses. Just 16% of school-age kids on Medi-Cal saw an eye doctor between 2022 and 2024, according to a report commissioned by the California Optometric Association. That’s down from 19% in 2015 and 2016.
Nearly all of California’s 58 counties showed a smaller proportion of kids receiving vision services, with rural areas seeing the steepest declines. Colusa County, a rural farming region north of Sacramento, had the sharpest drop — from 20% between 2015-16 to just under 2% between 2022-24.
- David Maxwell-Jolly, report author and former director of the Department of Health Care Services, which oversees Medi-Cal: “The decline in performance here is so widespread that something really needs to happen. These numbers are way lower than what you would expect to be seeing if we’re doing a good job of detecting kids with treatable conditions.”
Be part of the conversations driving California forward at the CalMatters Ideas Festival on May 21 in Sacramento. Get your tickets now.
Join CalMatters and the UC Student and Policy Center on April 23 in Sacramento for a conversation on the future of voting in California. Register today.
Join CalMatters on April 22 in Pasadena for a conversation on rebuilding after the devastating January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires. Register.
Other Stories You Should Know
CA bill wants to block some annoying texts
Getting promotional ads by phone text is already irritating enough, but getting them at night after 9 p.m. can be even more annoying. Unsurprisingly, a bill that would prohibit exactly that is finding strong bipartisan support among legislators.
Last week the Assembly’s committee on privacy and consumer protection passed a proposal that would ban businesses, political organizations and other industry groups from sending promotional text messages from 9 p.m. to 9 a.m., even if the user consented to receiving advertising texts. All lawmakers in the 15-member committee, including four Republicans, approved the measure.
The proposal is based on a Texas law, and violators could be fined up to $500 for every infraction. The California Chamber Of Commerce opposes the bill, arguing that most phones already enable users to silence texts at night, such as the “do not disturb” feature.
The bill now sits before the Assembly’s judiciary committee for consideration.
Judge rules Border Patrol must comply with previous order
In a court decision made public Thursday, a federal judge ruled that federal immigration enforcement agents kept making unlawful stops and arrests in California even after she ordered them to stop, report CalMatters’ Wendy Fry and Sergio Olmos.
The ruling by Judge Jennifer Thurston, a Biden-appointee, grants a motion filed by the United Farm Workers to enforce a preliminary injunction Thurston issued last year barring Border Patrol agents from carrying out warrantless arrests without reasonable cause.
The case relates to an immigration sweep last July, when agents detained a group of day laborers outside a Home Depot in Sacramento. Thurston said that the Sacramento operation violated her order from last year, which stemmed from earlier immigration raids in Kern County.
Attorneys for the federal government argued that the Sacramento sweep was based on surveillance and intelligence, but Thurston said the agents detained people “without any legal basis for doing so.”
Though the recent ruling allows an opportunity for agents to comply with her order, legal experts say penalties could escalate if Border Patrol and the Trump administration continue to be noncompliant.
And lastly: Media outlets demand access to warrants
A group of news outlets, including CalMatters, The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, filed a lawsuit Wednesday seeking to unseal the warrants Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco utilized to seize over 600,000 voting ballots. Bianco got the warrants from Judge Jay Kiel, whom Bianco endorsed when Kiel ran for the bench in 2022. Kiel sealed the warrants at the request of the sheriff’s office. Read more from CalMatters’ Ryan Sabalow and Jeanne Kuang.
California Voices
CalMatters columnist Dan Walters: The overcrowded field of Democratic candidates has rendered the contest for California governor less like a “race,” and more like an idle game of who blinks first.
Major water infrastructure failures, such as the rupture of a massive pipe on the Yuba River in February, will likely happen again as many dams, tunnels and canals across California are reaching their design lifespan, writes Keiko Mertz, director of Friends of the River.
Other things worth your time:
CA politicians react strongly to Supreme Court birthright case // The Sacramento Bee
Bianco argues Bonta is too partisan to overrule him on probe of Prop 50 ballots // San Francisco Chronicle
New CA bill battles food deserts in building boom // State Affairs
Iran war affects North Bay farmers facing fuel, fertilizer price hikes // The Press Democrat
Here’s what candidates for CA governor said during Central Valley forum // The Fresno Bee
LA considers waiving part of local sales tax for Palisades Fire victims rebuilding homes // LAist
Journalists, peaceful protesters were targeted by ICE, feds in LA, judges reaffirm // San Francisco Chronicle
New AI surveillance towers deployed along US-Mexico border in San Diego // The San Diego Union-Tribune
via CalMatters https://ift.tt/z0VrEHi


No comments:
Post a Comment